How American hesitation in the 1950s–60s reshaped Cuba, the Cold War, and U.S. power

Why did a 19th-century policy once keep Europe out of the Western Hemisphere—yet fail when it mattered most? In this video, Cliff Ribner covers the Monroe Doctrine, the Roosevelt Corollary, and the pivotal choices by Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy that, he argues, undermined U.S. credibility and opened the door to Castro, the Bay of Pigs, and the Cuban Missile Crisis.

What Makes This Video Essential Viewing

Watch to understand:
• The Doctrine in a line: Why Monroe’s 1823 warning deterred European meddling for generations
• Roosevelt’s Upgrade: How the corollary asserted an American “police power” in the hemisphere
• Cuba’s Tipping Point: Batista’s 1952 coup, Washington’s response, and Castro’s rise in 1959
• Signals & Deterrence: The Bay of Pigs decisions and the message they sent to Khrushchev
• Missiles & Leverage: How the Cuba standoff intersected with U.S. Jupiter missiles in Turkey
• Lessons Today: Why words, credibility, and power must align—or adversaries fill the gap

Why the Monroe Doctrine Still Matters

The Doctrine wasn’t abstract theory; it was a practical boundary that kept rival powers out of the Americas. Cliff Ribner shows how, when U.S. leaders failed to enforce that boundary in the 1950s–60s, the result was a hostile regime 90 miles from Florida, a humiliating failed invasion, and a nuclear brinksmanship that still shapes geopolitics.

Historical Context You Need to Know
• Monroe (1823): Opposed new European colonization in the New World
• Roosevelt Corollary (1904): Claimed a U.S. duty to prevent chronic instability and dictatorship in the region
• Cuba (1952–59): Batista’s coup → unrest → Castro’s takeover
• Bay of Pigs (1961): Exile invasion without U.S. air cover → swift defeat
• Missile Crisis (1962): Soviet deployment to Cuba → superpower standoff and secret bargaining
• Broader Ripples: Suez, Korea, Vietnam—case studies in credibility, deterrence, and cost

Questions This Video Answers
• What did the Monroe Doctrine and Roosevelt Corollary actually assert?
• How did U.S. choices in 1952–62 affect Cuba and the wider Cold War?
• Why does credible power (and the willingness to use it) matter more than slogans?
• What does “90 miles from Florida” really mean in strategic terms?
• How should America think about enforcing its red lines today?

Who Should Watch This Video

✅ Viewers interested in American history and foreign policy
✅ Citizens weighing deterrence vs. restraint in today’s conflicts
✅ Students and educators seeking a clear narrative of Cuba 1952–62
✅ Creators and researchers exploring the link between policy signals and outcomes

The Bottom Line

Cliff Ribner covers how two presidents’ decisions, in his view, betrayed the Monroe Doctrine and weakened U.S. deterrence—inviting crises that could have been avoided. You’ll come away with a sharpened understanding of how words, will, and military capacity must line up to keep the peace.

Key Takeaways from This Must-Watch Analysis

By the end, you’ll know:
• The difference between stating a doctrine and enforcing it
• How leadership choices in Washington shaped events in Havana and Moscow
• Why deterrence depends on clarity, consistency, and credible follow-through
• How 20th-century missteps inform 21st-century strategy

👉 Subscribe to Clifford Ribner on YouTube and Rumble for more in-depth analysis on constitutional law, freedom, and the rule of law in America.